LLM Comparisons — Page 4
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We evaluate OpenAI: GPT-5.2 vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 based on Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators to determine the current leader in developer-focused tasks.
OpenAI: GPT-5.2
4.5
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
5.5
Mistral: Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
This analysis evaluates the coding capabilities of Mistral: Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 using PeerLM's Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators benchmark suite.
Mistral: Mistral Small 3.2 24B
2.8
Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512
7.2
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We analyze the results of OpenAI: GPT-5.2 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 in our latest Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators benchmark to determine the superior coding assistant.
OpenAI: GPT-5.2
3.8
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5
6.3
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: R1: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We evaluated DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek: R1 on their Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators to determine the optimal model for development workflows.
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2
7.9
DeepSeek: R1
2.1
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
In our latest evaluation of Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators, we compare Meta: Llama 4 Maverick and Meta: Llama 4 Scout to determine the superior model for development workflows.
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
1.1
Meta: Llama 4 Scout
8.9
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
In our latest Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators assessment, we compare the output quality and efficiency of Meta: Llama 4 Maverick and Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
3.6
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
6.4
xAI: Grok 4 vs xAI: Grok 3: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We evaluate xAI: Grok 4 vs xAI: Grok 3 through 10 expert evaluators to determine the superior model for coding performance.
xAI: Grok 4
5.0
xAI: Grok 3
5.0
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
In our latest Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators benchmark, we compare Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview to determine which model excels in complex programming tasks.
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
6.0
Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview
4.0
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.2: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We analyze the coding capabilities of OpenAI: GPT-5.4 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.2 through a rigorous evaluation conducted by 10 independent evaluators.
OpenAI: GPT-5.4
6.5
OpenAI: GPT-5.2
3.5
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We compare Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash using PeerLM's Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators suite to determine the best coding assistant.
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
3.0
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
7.0
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We compare Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro using PeerLM's Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators benchmark to determine the superior coding assistant.
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
4.3
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro
5.7
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
A comparative analysis of OpenAI: GPT-5.4 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex, focusing on their respective Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators.
OpenAI: GPT-5.4
4.1
OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex
5.9