Model Comparisons
LLM comparisons backed by real evaluation data
Every comparison is powered by PeerLM's blind evaluation methodology. No opinions, no vibes — just data from anonymized, head-to-head testing.
Blind Testing
Models are anonymized. Evaluators never know which model produced which response.
Multi-Criteria Scoring
Each response is scored across weighted criteria specific to the use case.
Real Prompts
Comparisons use realistic prompts and system instructions, not synthetic benchmarks.
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Z.ai: GLM 5: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We analyze the coding capabilities of three top LLMs using PeerLM's expert evaluation suite, focusing on Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators.
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
0.9
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
5.9
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Mini vs Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We tested OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Mini vs Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash using Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators to determine the best model for developer workflows.
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Mini
7.3
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
2.3
DeepSeek: R1 vs OpenAI: o3 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
This comparison analyzes the Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators for DeepSeek: R1, OpenAI: o3, and Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 to determine the top performer.
DeepSeek: R1
1.7
OpenAI: o3
5.3
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We analyze the coding capabilities of three industry-leading LLMs through a rigorous evaluation suite focusing on Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators.
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
1.6
Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512
5.5
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We evaluate how OpenAI: GPT-5.4, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6, and Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview stack up in Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators.
OpenAI: GPT-5.4
4.6
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6
6.3
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We evaluated OpenAI: GPT-5.4, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6, and Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro using our Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators suite to determine the top performer in real-world software engineering tasks.
OpenAI: GPT-5.4
4.5
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6
4.9
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Mini vs Amazon: Nova Lite 1.0: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
This comparative analysis evaluates the coding proficiency of OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Mini vs Amazon: Nova Lite 1.0 using PeerLM's expert-led 10-evaluator benchmark suite.
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Mini
10.0
Amazon: Nova Lite 1.0
0.0
Perplexity: Sonar Pro vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We analyze the coding capabilities of Perplexity: Sonar Pro vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 using insights from 10 expert evaluators to determine the best model for development tasks.
Perplexity: Sonar Pro
3.3
OpenAI: GPT-5.4
6.7
Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We put Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 to the test in our Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators benchmark to determine the superior coding assistant.
Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0
0.8
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2
9.2
Amazon: Nova 2 Lite vs Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
In our latest benchmark for Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators, we compare Amazon: Nova 2 Lite and Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 to see which delivers better results.
Amazon: Nova 2 Lite
6.4
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
3.6
Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We evaluate Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 and Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview to determine the leader in Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators.
Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0
1.6
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
8.4
Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6: Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators
We evaluated Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 using our Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators suite to determine which model excels in software engineering tasks.
Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0
0.0
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6
10.0
Need a comparison we haven't covered?
Run your own blind evaluation in minutes. Compare any models, with your prompts, scored on your criteria.